|
We
reported on the Association’s criteria for implementing a policy
for referring stabilized methadone maintained patients from treatment
programs to off-site physician based settings during the previous
News Report of August, 1998. We recognize the challenges of implementing
such a new referral system, especially in view of the history
of restricting methadone treatment to licensed and regulated treatment
programs.
We
remind our readers that the underlying motivation for this policy
was to provide stabilized patients with an option to receive their
continued care in a setting that is different from the methadone
treatment program. We have consulted with patient advocacy groups,
including the National Alliance of Methadone Advocates (NAMA),
and we have been informed that such options would be favorably
received by stabilized patients in treatment settings.
The
Connecticut Pilot project, which refers stabilized patients to
off-site medical settings, has been in existence for over a year
and it is hoped that the state of Connecticut will be able to
file a report with the Center for Substance Abuse Treatment (CSAT)
about its progress very shortly.
The
value of expanding access to medical maintenance treatment is
to free up critically needed treatment slots for the untreated
opiate dependent individuals, who need access to methadone treatment
services. The Association’s criteria have been listed below and
may seem conservative at first sight. We have always taken the
view that this policy represents the first logical step in a long-term
strategic plan, which will work in conjunction with other medications
as well, such as Buprenorphine.
A
number of people have cited international findings regarding methadone
maintenance in physician offices, criticizing the Association’s
policy as being rigid. We have received conflicting information
about the success of such initiatives in Europe and Australia.
Dr. John Caplehorn (Australia) has published findings about methadone
related deaths in Australia as undertrained physicians prescribe
methadone to newly admitted opiate dependent patients.
We
continue to hold to the principles that certified physicians should
be involved in treating methadone maintained patients in their
private practice settings through this hub referral mechanism
in addition to physicians who have demonstrated a knowledge in
working with methadone maintenance treatment as documented by
a two year involvement in a treatment program. We will continue
to work with CSAT and other federal agencies to begin the process
of referring such patients to private practice settings, however,
a functioning treatment network needs to be established in order
to implement this policy.
Criteria for Stable Patient Referral from
Methadone Programs to Office Based Medical Practice Settings
“Expanding Access to Medical Maintenance Treatment”
| Program
Involvement: (We recommend the following criteria
for choosing the participating agencies): |
| |
|
|
|
Compliance
with federal and state regulatory authorities. |
| |
|
|
|
Adherence
to CSAT's State Methadone Treatment Guidelines and
the American Methadone Treatment Association's Ethical
Canon. |
| |
|
|
|
Licensed
as a "Narcotic Treatment Program" for a minimum of two years.
|
| |
|
|
|
Demonstrated
internal protocols for reviewing patient eligibility, utilizing
a multidisciplinary team approach including, at a minimum,
the program's Medical Director, Nurse Manager, and the patient's
counselor. |
| |
|
|
|
The
program shall contract with the participating physicians.
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Physician
Involvement: (Demonstrated interest in the treatment
of opioid dependent patients in his/her medical or psychiatric
practices as defined by): |
| |
|
|
|
Certification
by the American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology with subspecialty
certification in addiction psychiatry, certification by the
American Society of Addiction Medicine (ASAM) or Specialty
Board Certification of Physicians of the American Osteopathic
Association. It is recommended that physicians with such certification
sit for a course on opioid pharmacotherapy as offered by the
American Methadone Treatment Association or a recognized medical
society. |
| |
|
|
|
Physicians
without such certification, but with a documented two-year
involvement in a methadone treatment program, should sit for
a course on opioid pharmacotherapy as offered by the American
Methadone Treatment Association or a recognized medical society.
|
| |
|
|
|
Knowledge
of specific methadone prescribing practices as regulated by
state and federal law. |
| |
|
|
|
Practices
consistent with CSAT's State Methadone Treatment Guidelines.
|
| |
|
|
|
Agreement
to provide progress reports to the sponsoring "Narcotic Treatment
Program". |
| |
|
|
|
Agreement
to work with the patient and program regarding relapses or
unstable patients. |
| |
|
|
|
Provision
for urine screens. |
| |
|
|
|
No
pending state licensure actions against the participating
physician. |
| |
|
|
|
Proof
of minimum individual professional liability coverage as required
by the State Medical Board of Examiners or equivalent thereof.
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| Patient
Eligibility: (The patient must meet the following
criteria): |
| |
|
|
|
Patient
be physically and emotionally stable for 36 months. |
| |
|
|
|
The
patient should be free of alcohol and drug abuse for 36 months
verified by toxicology screening. |
| |
|
|
|
The
patient has not been convicted of any criminal activity for
36 months. |
| |
|
|
|
The
patient has been employed or in a similar capacity (a student,
homemaker or disabled) for 36 months as well as a stable living
environment. |
| |
|
|
|
Demonstrated
responsible use of take home methadone through a participating
licensed "Narcotic Treatment Program".
There
may be exceptions granted to the 36 month criteria. Exceptions
must be based on the individual's progress in treatment
and recommendations made by the treatment team as documented
in the clinical record. The process for which this decision
can be made must be endorsed and reviewed by the State Regulatory
Authority.
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| Organizational
Issues: |
| |
|
|
|
Professional
and agency liability: |
| |
|
|
|
A
copy of the physician's professional liability insurance would
be included in the physician's file, which would be kept at
the program site. |
| |
|
|
|
Professional
liability coverage would be incorporated into the contractual
agreement with participating physicians. |
| |
|
| Methadone
distribution to participating physicians: |
| |
|
|
|
The
participating physicians will be registered under the umbrella
of the narcotic treatment program license. |
| |
|
|
|
A
personnel file with resumes, license, registration numbers,
personal professional liability insurance carrier, and contract
to provide this service would be on file with the program.
|
| |
|
|
|
The
administration and dispensing of methadone hydrochloride in
an "off-site" physician based practice will require a change
in federal and state laws and regulations. |
| |
|
| Discontinuation
of off-site services: (Patients will be referred
back to the base "Narcotic Treatment Program" for continued
services for the following reasons): |
| |
|
|
|
Signs
and/or symptoms of recurring drug or alcohol misuse. |
| |
|
|
|
Negative
methadone urine screens or positive for drugs not appropriately
prescribed. |
| |
|
|
|
Significant
changes in mental/physical/behavioral status that would require
more patient supervision. |
| |
|
|
|
Noncompliance
with medical care. |
| |
|
|
|
Evidence
of criminal activity (drug or other). |
The
Board of Directors of the American Methadone Treatment Association
formed a Program Management Committee during 1997 to develop a
series of training symposia for program managers. The Association
convened the first management-training symposium in Washington,
DC on December 8, 1998 with the assistance of an educational grant
from Glaxo Wellcome, Inc.
The
symposium began the process of highlighting the Association’s
hallmark policy issues in improving the quality of care in methadone
treatment programs across the United States:
|
|
implementing
meaningful patient satisfaction survey instruments;
|
| |
|
|
|
changing
staff attitudes and improving patient outcome-implementing
staff attitudinal surveys; |
| |
|
|
|
preparing
methadone treatment programs for accreditation;
|
| |
|
|
|
implementing
pro active media and public relations strategies in methadone
treatment; and |
| |
|
|
|
preventing
medical negligence claims in methadone treatment programs.
|
| |
|
|
|